FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions

If your question isn’t answered here please email support+psyarxiv@osf.io

Introducing preprints & PsyArXiv

What is a preprint?

A preprint is a draft of a scholarly manuscript made available to the public prior to publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

Why post a preprint?

Making one’s work available as a preprint has several advantages. First, it rapidly disseminates the findings of your research (it takes just minutes to upload a paper to PsyArXiv). Second, you can receive feedback rapidly and prior to submission to a peer-reviewed journal. This improves the overall quality of scholarship. Third, preprints submitted to PsyArXiv are available to anyone with Internet access; this allows scholars, citizens, and businesses without journal subscriptions or access to academic libraries (including, importantly, those in developing nations) to access a version of scientific publications at no charge. Finally, preprints add transparency to the scientific process by allowing access to different (i.e., pre-review, pre-editorial) versions of a manuscript.

Why upload to this particular archive?

PsyArXiv is the premiere preprint archive for the psychological sciences, and it is run by a community organization – the Society for the Improvement in Psychology Science.  The technology is provided by the Center for Open Science, a non-profit that many psychologists are already using to share their data and other materials. New features are coming, such as commenting, that we hope will promote a rich dialogue about cutting-edge psychological research.

How do I submit a manuscript to PsyArXiv?

Simply visit http://psyarxiv.com and click on “Add a preprint.” The site will walk you through a five-step process of uploading a new preprint or adding a preprint directly from the Open Science Framework.

When uploading a preprint to PsyArXiv, you will be asked to state whether or not there is any associated dataset is available, whether the work was preregistered, and if there are any conflicts of interest that you would like to declare.

How do journals deal with preprints?

Journals differ in terms of how they deal with the posting of preprints. Prior to uploading a manuscript to PsyArXiv, you should review the policies of any journal you are considering as an outlet (SHERPA/RoMEO is a database containing the policies of most journals). Usually, preprints that do not include changes made as a part of the journal editorial and reviewing process may be made available through PsyArXiv. In some cases journals allow edited versions of a paper accepted for publication to be made available on a preprint server; however, the publisher’s version (i.e., that which includes formatting, layout, etc.) will likely remain the property of the journal (and thus not available for posting to PsyArXiv), except in the case of open-access journals. Authors can also negotiate for permission to post their preprints using tools such as the SPARC Author Addendum.

What were the motivations for creating PsyArXiv?

PsyArXiv was founded in order to speed and improve psychological science. It was established to increase access to scientific findings and papers. Certainly all of us within academia, and a great number of the lay public, have encountered obstacles (paywalls, combing through overlapping search engines, etc.) in gaining access to articles. Such obstacles relegate access to some of the highest quality research to a privileged few. An insular, rigidly hierarchical science is a sick science.

The current journal publishing system heavily emphasizes novel, positive, unexpected results. Studies which fail to meet this threshold are often left in the proverbial “file drawer.” Yet not disseminating null results is detrimental to the quality and caliber of published work as well as to the advancement of scientific knowledge. Preprint servers enable scientists to clear their “file drawer” in the same way they might have had such studies been accepted for publication. This informs researchers about boundary conditions and reduces the repetition of failures across many labs which, at present, simply go unrecognized. Such failures end up draining public funds and waste valuable time.

Preprint servers also serves the aim of improving science by seeking to increase the quality of published work. The peer review process at most journals solicits feedback from two or three academics; in contrast, a preprint service offers the opportunity to provide and receive feedback from a broader range of academics, and can encourage feedback on the structure, presentation of analyses, and readability of a paper, in addition to the theoretical and/or empirical claims in the paper. This additional feedback can greatly improve the quality of work that is eventually published.

Why now?

Over the last several years, researchers, funders, and governments have increasingly recognized the need for more transparent and open science, both in the process of conducting studies and in that of disseminating results. More emphasis is being placed on attempting to replicate studies; individuals are encouraged or required to post their data and materials; analytic and methodological transparency, including reporting of null findings, has been strongly encouraged; and there has been increased recognition of the problems posed by the file drawer. All of these changes have culminated in an understanding that the current processes by which studies are discovered and, at times, disseminated stand in direct opposition to many of the aspirational goals of open science.

Is this service a replacement for journals?

PsyArXiv is not intended to replace journals. A preprint service is primarily intended to offer access to manuscripts before publication. However, in fields like physics and computer science, the popular arXiv.org preprint service (from which the PsyArXiv name comes) has become an integral part of the publication process. Posting one’s manuscript to arXiv greatly increases discoverability, meaning that one’s work is more likely to be seen, discussed, and cited. For science in the age of the Internet, the role of journals may become largely a way to collate research into relevant categories based on topic, discipline, or geography. However, formal peer review is an integral part of science, and journals play a critical role in facilitating this function.

Posting preprints, updating and other technical questions

What is the file size limit for uploading preprints?

5 GB

I have uploaded different versions of my article. Is there any way to remove or delete the previous versions?

The only way to remove previous versions of an article would be to completely withdraw the article. We believe it’s preferable to keep the various versions of papers, and ask that people upload their final accepted version so that’s what’s visible when people visit the page on PsyArxiv. Our view is that the versions provide really valuable context for how ideas develop, and on the impact of the peer review process, which will provide valuable information for meta-scientists and historians of science in years to come. Furthermore, just because a published version of an article might be open access now, that does not mean it will remain open access in perpetuity. Journals change hands, move domains, and things get lost or deleted. Maintaining all versions on PsyArxiv will ensure they are retained in the scientific record no matter what. 

How long will it take for my paper to pass the pending stage of post-moderation? I submitted it early this week, and I still have not heard anything yet.

PsyArXiv operates a post-moderation system, which means that your preprint is visible as soon as you upload it – you do not need to wait for moderation. PsyArXiv receives thousands of submissions a year, so moderation can take some time, but we are taking steps to reduce backlogs. 

I am doing a grey literature search and have entered my search terms getting back many pages of pre-print references- can I export all the references returned into an excel file?

Sadly, no

Psyarxiv papers are picked up by Google Scholar, but the citations are not added. Can you fix this?

If citations are picked up by Google Scholar for a preprint and a published version of the same article, you can merge the citation counts in your Google Scholar account. When you log into your Google Scholar account you can add, delete, edit, and merge articles in your own profile.

One of my PsyArXiv is quite frequently cited …although the peer-reviewed paper has been accepted and published in the meanwhile (in the journal). Is it possible to connect those two somehow, so that people cite the article from now, not the preprint?

There’s an option to add the published paper DOI on psyarxiv

Is it possible to update an existing preprint “programatically”, for example throguh the API? Let’s say I have a pdf on OSF, and I originally manually link this pdf in the OSF project to the psyarxiv preprint submission. I would like to refresh the preprint when that pdf on OSF is refreshed without having to manually go through the psyarxiv edit preprint process.

Our API does support PUT and PATCH updates to metadata and file versions. Our API documentation goes over the parameters of this: https://developer.osf.io/#operation/nodes_read

We also have an API bootcamp here that will walk you through using the API if you need a little more help: https://osf.io/w3egs/wiki/9.%20Update%20OSF%20Content/

I often discover new papers via my phone. The full-page viewer is unusable.

This is a constraint of publishing PDFs, which are not an accessible document format.

How do I add tags to a preprint?

When you upload or edit a preprint you can add keyword tags in the “basics” section, under “keywords”

Do you only accept pre-prints in English or in other languages as well?

Yes, we accept non-English submissions, but please note that our moderation capacity for other languages is limited.

What kind of documents are allowed? Is it only articles which are intended for journal publication?

No, we accept a wide range of types of submissions, not just to-be-published articles. There are a few things we don’t accept.

  • Joke submissions; Tables of Contents for published books; Submissions without author details; class assignments; data dictionaries; reference lists (e.g. from systematic literature searches) [Please note, some of these are suitable for hosting at https://osf.io/]

We do accept the following, but encourage alternative hosting first

  • Questionnaires or scientific protocols should be hosted on https://osf.io/